Filed: May 01, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2435 In Re: ALLAN J. CULVER, JR., Debtor. ALLAN JAMES CULVER, JR. Debtor - Appellant, versus GMAC, Creditor - Appellee, F. VERNON BOOZER; EDWARD C. COVAHEY, JR.; THOMAS P. DORE; ROGER J. SULLIVAN; GEORGE W. LIEBMANN, Trustees - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-3071-CCB, BK-99-57676) Submitted: April 21, 2003 Decide
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2435 In Re: ALLAN J. CULVER, JR., Debtor. ALLAN JAMES CULVER, JR. Debtor - Appellant, versus GMAC, Creditor - Appellee, F. VERNON BOOZER; EDWARD C. COVAHEY, JR.; THOMAS P. DORE; ROGER J. SULLIVAN; GEORGE W. LIEBMANN, Trustees - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-3071-CCB, BK-99-57676) Submitted: April 21, 2003 Decided..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2435 In Re: ALLAN J. CULVER, JR., Debtor. ALLAN JAMES CULVER, JR. Debtor - Appellant, versus GMAC, Creditor - Appellee, F. VERNON BOOZER; EDWARD C. COVAHEY, JR.; THOMAS P. DORE; ROGER J. SULLIVAN; GEORGE W. LIEBMANN, Trustees - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-3071-CCB, BK-99-57676) Submitted: April 21, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan James Culver, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Windsor Biser, MUDD, HARRISON & BURCH, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Allan James Culver, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his request to set aside a foreclosure sale. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court. See Culver v. Boozer, Nos. CA-02-3071- CCB; BK-99-57676 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2