Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spencer v. Tyco Electronics, 03-1389 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1389 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 16, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1389 SANDRA LYNETTE SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; AIR EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-949-1) Submitted: September 29, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1389 SANDRA LYNETTE SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; AIR EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-949-1) Submitted: September 29, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sandra Lynette Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Kristin Elise Toussaint, George Andrew Harper, JACKSON LEWIS L.L.P., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sandra Lynette Spencer appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment in her employment discrimination action and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Tyco Electronics Corp., No. CA-01- 949-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 27 and May 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer