Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robinson v. Commissioner, 03-1605 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-1605 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 11, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Filed: September 11, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1605 (Tax Ct. No. 01-2020) Brenda H. Robinson, Petitioner - Appellant, versus Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent - Appellee. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed September 3, 2003, as follows: On page 2, line 6 - “the district court” is corrected to read “the Tax Court.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCU
More
Filed: September 11, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1605 (Tax Ct. No. 01-2020) Brenda H. Robinson, Petitioner - Appellant, versus Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent - Appellee. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed September 3, 2003, as follows: On page 2, line 6 -- “the district court” is corrected to read “the Tax Court.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1605 BRENDA H. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 01-2020) Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda H. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Karen Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Brenda H. Robinson appeals the tax court’s order: (1) determining that the Commissioner may proceed to collect Robinson’s outstanding tax liability for 1993 and 1994; and (2) assessing a penalty pursuant to I.R.C. § 6673 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Tax Court. See Robinson v. Commissioner, IRS, No. 01-2020 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer