Filed: Feb. 13, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1823 TERRELL H. DYCHES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-3818-1-23) Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1823 TERRELL H. DYCHES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-3818-1-23) Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1823 TERRELL H. DYCHES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of the Department of Energy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-3818-1-23) Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrell H. Dyches, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Terrell H. Dyches, Jr., appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dyches v. Abraham, No. CA-01-3818-1-23 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
