Filed: Jul. 09, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1852 SYED M. A. HASAN, Petitioner, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review Board. (02-121; 02-ERA-18-ALJ) Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed M. A. Hasan, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1852 SYED M. A. HASAN, Petitioner, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review Board. (02-121; 02-ERA-18-ALJ) Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed M. A. Hasan, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associa..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1852
SYED M. A. HASAN,
Petitioner,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review
Board. (02-121; 02-ERA-18-ALJ)
Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Syed M. A. Hasan, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor
of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associate Solicitor Fair Labor
Standards, Paul L. Frieden, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Joan
Brenner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Syed M. A. Hasan, a pro se petitioner, requests review under
42 U.S.C. § 5851(c)(1) (1995) of the Energy Reorganization Act of
a final order issued by the Administrative Review Board of the
United States Department of Labor (the “Board”), affirming the
Recommended Decision and Order of the administrative law judge and
dismissing Hasan’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the Board. Hasan v. United States Dep’t of Labor, Nos. 02-121, 02-
ERA-18-ALJ (U.S.D.O.L. June 25, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -