Filed: Mar. 02, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7359 ASHANN-RA, Plaintiff - Appellant, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff, versus GENE M. JOHNSON; LINDA SHEAR; TIM W. EVANS, Counselor; CORPORAL VIERS, Claim #13; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Claims #13 and #22; RON ANGELONE, Claim #22; DAN ARMSTRONG; DUNCAN MILLS, Claim #22; CHIEF OF OPERATIONS, Claim #22; DANIEL BRAXTON, Claim #35; LARRY HUFFMAN, Claim #35; GARY L. BASS; W. W. ROGERS, Defendants - Appellees,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7359 ASHANN-RA, Plaintiff - Appellant, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff, versus GENE M. JOHNSON; LINDA SHEAR; TIM W. EVANS, Counselor; CORPORAL VIERS, Claim #13; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Claims #13 and #22; RON ANGELONE, Claim #22; DAN ARMSTRONG; DUNCAN MILLS, Claim #22; CHIEF OF OPERATIONS, Claim #22; DANIEL BRAXTON, Claim #35; LARRY HUFFMAN, Claim #35; GARY L. BASS; W. W. ROGERS, Defendants - Appellees, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7359
ASHANN-RA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Intervenor/Plaintiff,
versus
GENE M. JOHNSON; LINDA SHEAR; TIM W. EVANS,
Counselor; CORPORAL VIERS, Claim #13;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Claims #13 and #22;
RON ANGELONE, Claim #22; DAN ARMSTRONG; DUNCAN
MILLS, Claim #22; CHIEF OF OPERATIONS, Claim
#22; DANIEL BRAXTON, Claim #35; LARRY HUFFMAN,
Claim #35; GARY L. BASS; W. W. ROGERS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TONY F. MCANALLY; D. P. SMITH, Classification;
RICHARD A. YOUNG; LARRY W. HUFFMAN; MELANIE
PARR; REGIONAL OMBUDSMAN; PAGE TRUE; STAN
YOUNG; ADAM HARVEY; TERRY MONK, Counselor; M.
HENSLEY; STACY RIDER; FARMER, Mailroom Clerk;
RICHARDSON, Mailroom Clerk; CORPORAL RUSSELL;
SERGEANT HEAD; JERRY W. ARMENTROUT; D. VASS;
RICHARD FLEMING, Major; LESLIE FLEMING,
Captain; BILL FERGUSON; J. KISER, Captain;
KELLY JEAN CHRIS, Lieutenant; MICHAEL YOUNCE,
Lieutenant; STACY MULLINS, Lieutenant; L. W.
COX, Lieutenant; JIM ROBINSON, Lieutenant;
CHARLES RAMBO; JOHN HONAKER, Lieutenant; RICKY
ROSE, Lieutenant; RONALD MACK FOWLER,
Lieutenant; J. B. QUINN, Sergeant; GREGORY
DEEL, Sergeant; SERGEANT CHILDRESS; DELMER
TATE; JOHNNY KENDRICK; JEFFREY D. PHILLIPS;
NANCY ROSE; G. COUNTS, Corporal; J. ELY; T.
HALE; J. ARTRIP, Officer; T. YOUNCE; B.
MAGGARD; W. SCANLON; S. DEEL; D. DEEL; A.
KILBOURNE; CORPORAL RING; D. GREGORY BAKER;
CORPORAL FLUTZ; CORPORAL BAKER; CORPORAL
CREEAR; CORPORAL FOSTER; CORPORAL DEEL;
CORPORAL BROWN; R. A. EDWARDS, JR., M.D.,
Corporal; JOHN DOE; OFFICER IN CHARGE; J.
LARGE; CORPORAL HOPKINS; JOHN DOE, Two unknown
A-3 control room correctional officers; TIM W.
EVANS, Counselor; L. MILLS, Counselor; R.
DUFFY, Counselor; L. MULLINS, Counselor; J.
BOLLING; N. C. LEWIS; COUNSELOR SYKES;
COUNSELOR JESSEE; COUNSELOR GIBSON; SANDY
MULLINS; TERESA PEASE, Mailroom Clerk; LEIGH
MCCOY; PAMELA SAUL; D. MCKNIGHT; L. MILLINS,
Hearing Officer; ROSE, Laundry Manager; J.
FRALEY, Former Virginia Department of
Corrections Officer,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-927-7)
Submitted: December 31, 2003 Decided: March 2, 2004
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ashann-Ra, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Z. Rabinovitz, Catherine
Yvonne Hancock, Michael Scott Raab, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, for Intervenor. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney
General, for Appellees.
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Ashann-Ra appeals the district court’s order denying his
free exercise claim filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See
Ashann-Ra v. Johnson, No. CA-02-927-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 4 -