Filed: Jan. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7470 ADOLPHE MOUNKASSA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK; HARRELL WATTS; M. PITT; M. LEWIS, Unit Manager at Low Security Correctional Institution Butner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-383-5-BR) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Bef
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7470 ADOLPHE MOUNKASSA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK; HARRELL WATTS; M. PITT; M. LEWIS, Unit Manager at Low Security Correctional Institution Butner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-383-5-BR) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Befo..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7470
ADOLPHE MOUNKASSA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. SCOTT DODRILL; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK;
HARRELL WATTS; M. PITT; M. LEWIS, Unit Manager
at Low Security Correctional Institution
Butner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-383-5-BR)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adolphe Mounkassa, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Adolphe Mounkassa appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint alleging a violation under Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Mounkassa v. Dodrill, No. CA-02-383-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug.
28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -