Filed: Feb. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7835 KEVIN M. BALLANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAGE TRUE, Warden, S1SP; GENE JOHNSON, Assistant Director; SERGEANT BYRD, Property Sergeant; INVESTIGATOR SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1263-AM) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7835 KEVIN M. BALLANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAGE TRUE, Warden, S1SP; GENE JOHNSON, Assistant Director; SERGEANT BYRD, Property Sergeant; INVESTIGATOR SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1263-AM) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7835
KEVIN M. BALLANCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAGE TRUE, Warden, S1SP; GENE JOHNSON,
Assistant Director; SERGEANT BYRD, Property
Sergeant; INVESTIGATOR SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-1263-AM)
Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin M. Ballance, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ballance v. True, No. CA-03-1263-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 17.
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -