Filed: Jan. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7843 JAMES EDWARD BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT W. KING, JR., Defendant - Appellee, and THE PEOPLE OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-944-AM) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7843 JAMES EDWARD BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT W. KING, JR., Defendant - Appellee, and THE PEOPLE OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-944-AM) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7843 JAMES EDWARD BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT W. KING, JR., Defendant - Appellee, and THE PEOPLE OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-944-AM) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and order and find the appeal frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Brown’s motion for an evidentiary hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
