Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. McCall, 03-7865 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 03-7865 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7865 CLEVELAND LEWIS WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DARNELL MCCALL, Chief of Police Anderson City Detention Center; BOBBY GUNNER, Correction Officer; ANGELA WHITE, Nurse; ALLEN MCALISTER, a/k/a Gofer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-4275-8-12BI) Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7865 CLEVELAND LEWIS WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DARNELL MCCALL, Chief of Police Anderson City Detention Center; BOBBY GUNNER, Correction Officer; ANGELA WHITE, Nurse; ALLEN MCALISTER, a/k/a Gofer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-4275-8-12BI) Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 20, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Michael Brian Wren, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Cleveland Lewis Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. McCall, No. CA-01-4275-8-12BI (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer