Filed: Jul. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6008 SEAN MCCALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BERKELEY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-2448-2-18) Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6008 SEAN MCCALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BERKELEY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-2448-2-18) Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6008 SEAN MCCALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BERKELEY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-02-2448-2-18) Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean McCall, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Alexia Pittas-Giroux, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sean McCall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and related state tort claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff, No. CA-02-2448-2-18 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
