Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robinson v. Brooks, 04-6190 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-6190 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jul. 14, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6190 LEROY ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institution at Petersburg, Virginia; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-424-2) Submitted: June 28, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6190 LEROY ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institution at Petersburg, Virginia; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-424-2) Submitted: June 28, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leroy Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Brooks, No. CA-03-424-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer