UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6521 STACY W. HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGETOWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT BODY; CHARLES V. PYLE; MALCOLM D. SHULER; BENJAMIN F. DUNN; HUGHEY WALKER; ELERBEE ACKERMAN; ROBBIE O’DONNELL; LANE CRIBB, Sheriff; DAN FURR; AL WILLIAMS, Chief; JOHN HILLIARD; G. TURNER PERROW; JOE CROSBY; MIKE SWARTZ; CHUCK KOSIS; KENNETH OWENS, Captain; GEORGETOWN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; SOLICITORS OFFICE; TOWNSHIPS IN GEORGETOWN COUNTY; ADMINISTRATION OF GOVERNMENT FOR GEORGETOWN COUNTY, including government body and political subdivisions; OTHERS AS YET UNKNOWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-36-6-13AK) Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 1, 2004 Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Stacy W. Howard appeals the district court’s order, accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Howard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Georgetown County Gov’t, No. CA-04-36-6-13AK (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -