Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jackson v. Haydu, 04-2078 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-2078 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 15, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2078 ALPHONSO JACKSON, Acting Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE HAYDU, Defendant - Appellant, and BUYERS SOURCE SUGARMILL, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE SAVANNAH, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE VALLEY GROUP, L.L.C.; ISLAND REALTY, L.L.C.; BSMC, INCORPORATED; BELMONT PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; ONE SOURCE EQUITY, L.L.C.; FREDERICK BLAKE; THOMAS BREWER; LANNY CAMPBELL; SUSAN GARD; HENRY MONTGOMERY;
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2078 ALPHONSO JACKSON, Acting Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE HAYDU, Defendant - Appellant, and BUYERS SOURCE SUGARMILL, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE SAVANNAH, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE VALLEY GROUP, L.L.C.; ISLAND REALTY, L.L.C.; BSMC, INCORPORATED; BELMONT PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; ONE SOURCE EQUITY, L.L.C.; FREDERICK BLAKE; THOMAS BREWER; LANNY CAMPBELL; SUSAN GARD; HENRY MONTGOMERY; SUSAN SMOTHERS, a/k/a Susan Strothers; JO ANNE BARROS; DARRELL BROOKS; PATRICK CAMPBELL; MIKE DURHAM; BILL ELKO; LEON LUCARELLI, a/k/a Leon Masterson; BEVERLY MCPHERSON; DAWN MOCK; CHRIS A. MONTGOMERY; GREGORY SANJURJO; JEFF VOTAW; SANDY WILLIAMS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-591-2) Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 15, 2005 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Haydu, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Cozad Biddle, Tara Leigh Grove, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: George Haydu appeals the district court’s order imposing an injunctive sanction and ordering restitution for conduct that violated the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Haydu, No. CA-03-591-2 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer