Filed: Jan. 21, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7884 In Re: DEMMERICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demetrious Eric Brown, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (CA-01-144) Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demmerick Eric Brown, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 3
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7884 In Re: DEMMERICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demetrious Eric Brown, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (CA-01-144) Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demmerick Eric Brown, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7884
In Re: DEMMERICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a
Demetrious Eric Brown, a/k/a
Denrick Eric Brown,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(CA-01-144)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demmerick Eric Brown, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Demmerick Eric Brown petitions for writ of mandamus
seeking an order from this court to have the Virginia Parole Board
change a prior decision finding that he was statutorily ineligible
for parole. Mandamus relief is only available when there are no
other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re
Beard,
811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a
substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe,
973 F.2d 1133,
1135 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we deny the motion for appointment of counsel
and the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -