Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spears v. Betsy Johnson Health, 05-1544 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1544 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 29, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1544 LAZONA GALE SPEARS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BETSY JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; DONNA WIMBERLY, individually and in her official capacity as Director of Nursing; BETTE MATNEY, individually and in her official capacity as Human Resources Manager; DENNIS J. COFFEY, individually and in his official capacity as Vice-President of Finance; SHANNON BROWN, individually and in his official capacity as Adminis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1544 LAZONA GALE SPEARS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BETSY JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; DONNA WIMBERLY, individually and in her official capacity as Director of Nursing; BETTE MATNEY, individually and in her official capacity as Human Resources Manager; DENNIS J. COFFEY, individually and in his official capacity as Vice-President of Finance; SHANNON BROWN, individually and in his official capacity as Administrator, Defendants - Appellees, and JOSEPH CLAY POTTER, in his capacity as Operating Room Manager, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-01-962-5-BO) Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: December 29, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lazona Gale Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Norman Thompson, L. Diane Tindall, Mary M. Williams, WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Lazona Gale Spears appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her civil action alleging claims arising from her employment, and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Spears v. Betsy Johnson Health Care Sys., Inc., No. CA-01-962-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3 & Apr. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer