Filed: Aug. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6545 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLARENCE EDWARD ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-95-13-BO) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Edward
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6545 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLARENCE EDWARD ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-95-13-BO) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Edward ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6545
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLARENCE EDWARD ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CR-95-13-BO)
Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Edward Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria
Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Edward Alexander seeks to appeal his conviction
and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his
notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.
App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court
may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a
showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P.
4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes,
759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).
The district court entered its judgment on February 2,
1996. Alexander filed his notice of appeal on March 16, 2005, far
beyond the appeal or extension period. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal as untimely filed. We dispense with oral argument as the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court.
DISMISSED
- 2 -