Filed: Jun. 26, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7931 WILLIE J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER TRICE; OFFICER LAWLER; LIEUTENANT BAKER; NURSE LOCKIDY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-320) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7931 WILLIE J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER TRICE; OFFICER LAWLER; LIEUTENANT BAKER; NURSE LOCKIDY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-320) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7931 WILLIE J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER TRICE; OFFICER LAWLER; LIEUTENANT BAKER; NURSE LOCKIDY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-320) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 26, 2006 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Willie J. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Trice, No. CA-05-320 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We also deny Williams’ motion for removal to another facility until his appeal is final. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
