Filed: Jun. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1006 BAHMAN PAYMAN, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. Z. AHSAN; KHALOUCK ABDRABBO, M.D.; ATIQUE MIRZA, M.D.; DR. ROY SHELBOURNE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-18-2) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1006 BAHMAN PAYMAN, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. Z. AHSAN; KHALOUCK ABDRABBO, M.D.; ATIQUE MIRZA, M.D.; DR. ROY SHELBOURNE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-18-2) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1006 BAHMAN PAYMAN, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. Z. AHSAN; KHALOUCK ABDRABBO, M.D.; ATIQUE MIRZA, M.D.; DR. ROY SHELBOURNE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-18-2) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Bragg, BRAGG LAW, PLC, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: By order entered March 31, 2005, the district court permanently enjoined and prohibited Bahman Payman, M.D., from filing any lawsuit against Dr. Roy Shelbourne and other named individuals without first obtaining written leave from the court. In November 2005, Payman sought leave from the court to file a lawsuit against Shelbourne and others. By order entered November 26, 2005, the court denied Payman’s request. Payman now appeals the court’s denial, but only with respect to Shelbourne. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Payman v. Ahsan, No. CA-05-18-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -