Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Link v. Commissioner, IRS, 06-1993 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1993 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1993 HENRY R. LINK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 04-11065) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry R. Link, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, David I. Pincus, M
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1993 HENRY R. LINK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 04-11065) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry R. Link, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, David I. Pincus, Mary Roccapriore Pelletier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry R. Link appeals the tax court’s order (1) upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies and penalties with respect to Link’s 1998 through 2001 federal income tax liability and (2) denying Link’s motion to reopen the record in order to submit additional evidence. Our review of the record and the tax court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Link v. Commissioner, IRS, No. 04-11065 (U.S.T.C. July 24, 2006). We deny Link’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer