Filed: Dec. 22, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7735 QUINTIS DYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decid
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7735 QUINTIS DYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decide..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7735 QUINTIS DYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Quintis Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
