Filed: Apr. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7979 WAYNE A. SOUSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT J. ROBINSON, Building 9; LIEUTENANT G. JACOBS, Building 9; L. JOHNSON, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-05-481-2) Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 27, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7979 WAYNE A. SOUSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT J. ROBINSON, Building 9; LIEUTENANT G. JACOBS, Building 9; L. JOHNSON, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-05-481-2) Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 27, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7979
WAYNE A. SOUSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT J. ROBINSON, Building 9; LIEUTENANT
G. JACOBS, Building 9; L. JOHNSON, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-05-481-2)
Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: April 27, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne A. Souser, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wayne A. Souser appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record, considered the Supreme Court’s recent
decision in Jones v. Bock,
127 S. Ct. 910 (2007), and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Souser v. Robinson, No. CA-05-481-2 (E.D. Va.
Dec. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -