Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shipkovitz v. Arlington County, 06-1897 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1897 Visitors: 38
Filed: Oct. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1897 SAMUEL SHIPKOVITZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, and STEPHEN C. CROSSAN; ANTHONY SABO, Plaintiffs, versus SHARITA HUGHES; S. KEITH GRIERSON; RON CARLEE, County of Arlington Manager; DANA WILSON; RICHARD FREEMAN; LOUISE M. DIMATTEO, Defendants - Appellees, and ARLINGTON COUNTY, Manager; ROBERT SPECK; CHAS. E. SMITH MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED; PHILIP ALMEIDA; BLACK ICE SECURITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE-I, Black Ice employ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1897 SAMUEL SHIPKOVITZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, and STEPHEN C. CROSSAN; ANTHONY SABO, Plaintiffs, versus SHARITA HUGHES; S. KEITH GRIERSON; RON CARLEE, County of Arlington Manager; DANA WILSON; RICHARD FREEMAN; LOUISE M. DIMATTEO, Defendants - Appellees, and ARLINGTON COUNTY, Manager; ROBERT SPECK; CHAS. E. SMITH MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED; PHILIP ALMEIDA; BLACK ICE SECURITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE-I, Black Ice employee-alleged guard; WATERFORD HOUSE UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Waterford House Condominium Association, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01219-CMH) Submitted: September 24, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Shipkovitz, Appellant Pro Se. Louise Marie DiMatteo, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia; Michael Joseph Holleran, Yama Anthony Shansab, WALTON & ADAMS, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Samuel Shipkovitz appeals a district court order granting an Appellee’s motion to dismiss and a district court order granting summary judgment to the remaining Appellees and closing the case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Shipkovitz v. Arlington County, No. 1:05-cv-01219-CMH (E.D. Va. filed May 12, 2006, entered May 17, 2006; filed June 22, 2006, entered June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer