Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Burch v. Dunn, 06-2293 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-2293 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jun. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2293 THOMAS B. BURCH, Appellant, versus ROBERT R. DUNN, Chapter 11 Trustee, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00240; 04-03236) Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 4, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Burch, Appellant Pro S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2293 THOMAS B. BURCH, Appellant, versus ROBERT R. DUNN, Chapter 11 Trustee, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00240; 04-03236) Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 4, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Burch, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence E. Behning, KENNEDY, COVINGTON, LOBDELL & HICKMAN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Burch appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motion for reconsideration of the entry of default, reinstating the entry of default, and granting default judgment in favor of the Chapter 7 Trustee on the Trustee’s complaint alleging fraudulent and preferential transfers. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burch v. Dunn, Nos. 3:05-cv-00240; 04-03236 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer