Filed: Apr. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7224 CHAD TYRONE KINCAID, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; DOCTOR ABERNATHY; GARY CLARK, Sheriff; SERGEANTS ON DUTY ON SPECIFIC DATES, CALDWELL COUNTY, NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00065) Submitted: March 12, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007 Before W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7224 CHAD TYRONE KINCAID, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; DOCTOR ABERNATHY; GARY CLARK, Sheriff; SERGEANTS ON DUTY ON SPECIFIC DATES, CALDWELL COUNTY, NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00065) Submitted: March 12, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007 Before WI..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7224 CHAD TYRONE KINCAID, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; DOCTOR ABERNATHY; GARY CLARK, Sheriff; SERGEANTS ON DUTY ON SPECIFIC DATES, CALDWELL COUNTY, NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00065) Submitted: March 12, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chad Tyrone Kincaid, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chad Tyrone Kincaid appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kincaid v. U.S. Marshal Serv., No. 5:06- cv-00065 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2006). We also deny Kincaid’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
