Filed: Jan. 23, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7457 JAMES MICHAEL MCGILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE E. SNYDER; DAVID FARMER; W. BRANCH; R. CHERRY; B. HEDSPETH; T. HOWELL; K. DUBOSE; S. DORSEY; G. SEXTON; J. AGUILAR; D. GOODMAN; D.D. DOUGLAS; M. YOUNG; S.D. STEVENSON; C. WARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL)
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7457 JAMES MICHAEL MCGILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE E. SNYDER; DAVID FARMER; W. BRANCH; R. CHERRY; B. HEDSPETH; T. HOWELL; K. DUBOSE; S. DORSEY; G. SEXTON; J. AGUILAR; D. GOODMAN; D.D. DOUGLAS; M. YOUNG; S.D. STEVENSON; C. WARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL) S..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7457
JAMES MICHAEL MCGILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE E. SNYDER; DAVID FARMER; W. BRANCH; R.
CHERRY; B. HEDSPETH; T. HOWELL; K. DUBOSE; S.
DORSEY; G. SEXTON; J. AGUILAR; D. GOODMAN;
D.D. DOUGLAS; M. YOUNG; S.D. STEVENSON; C.
WARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL)
Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Michael McGill, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Michael McGill appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -