Filed: Mar. 26, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7490 SHAUN WAYNE WILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director SCDC; BERNARD MCKIE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-02111-CMC) Submitted: February 23, 2007 Decided: March 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judge
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7490 SHAUN WAYNE WILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director SCDC; BERNARD MCKIE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-02111-CMC) Submitted: February 23, 2007 Decided: March 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7490 SHAUN WAYNE WILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director SCDC; BERNARD MCKIE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-02111-CMC) Submitted: February 23, 2007 Decided: March 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shaun Wayne Wiles, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shaun Wayne Wiles appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wiles v. Ozmint, No. 0:05-cv-02111-CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
