Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bradley v. Sutton, 06-7674 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7674 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 01, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7674 ANTHONY L. BRADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ISTIVAN CLEVONDON DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, versus ERNEST R. SUTTON, Superintendent of Pasquotank Correctional Institute, Defendant - Appellee, and MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor; THEODIS BECK, Secretary, NC Department of Correction; DUPLIN COUNTY MINIMUM CUSTODY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7674 ANTHONY L. BRADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ISTIVAN CLEVONDON DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, versus ERNEST R. SUTTON, Superintendent of Pasquotank Correctional Institute, Defendant - Appellee, and MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor; THEODIS BECK, Secretary, NC Department of Correction; DUPLIN COUNTY MINIMUM CUSTODY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00248-H) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 1, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony L. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony L. Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.* Bradley v. Sutton, No. 5:05-ct-00248-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Specifically, Bradley failed to exhaust his administrative remedies relative to the claims that are the subject of the instant action. - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer