Filed: Jan. 24, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7711 ROBERT LAMONT SUTTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TERRY O’BRIEN; BLEDSOE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L, Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00477-jlk) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7711 ROBERT LAMONT SUTTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TERRY O’BRIEN; BLEDSOE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L, Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00477-jlk) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lamo..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7711 ROBERT LAMONT SUTTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TERRY O’BRIEN; BLEDSOE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L, Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00477-jlk) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lamont Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Lamont Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sutton v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00477-jlk (W.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
