Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hicks v. Commissioner, SSA, 07-1171 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1171 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1171 CHRISTOPHER G. HICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00222) Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1171 CHRISTOPHER G. HICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00222) Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George L. Fitzgerald, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Sidney P. Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Dino Trubiano, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher G. Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. Commissioner, No. 1:06-cv-00222 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer