Filed: Sep. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1522 BERTHA CUMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; HERBERT BROWN, Director, Norfolk, Virginia Office, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00705-WDK) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Af
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1522 BERTHA CUMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; HERBERT BROWN, Director, Norfolk, Virginia Office, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00705-WDK) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Aff..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1522 BERTHA CUMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; HERBERT BROWN, Director, Norfolk, Virginia Office, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00705-WDK) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bertha Cummings, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bertha Cummings appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss her petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cummings v. EEOC, No. 2:06-cv-00705-WDK (E.D. Va. filed May 9, 2007; entered May 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
