Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Murray v. Youngs, 07-6157 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6157 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 15, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6157 RICKY LAFAYETTE MURRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFREY D. YOUNGS, Official Capacity; J. BENJAMIN APLIN; SYMMES W. CULBERTSON; FLETCHER N. SMITH, JR.; DAWN V. KOFFS KEY; SUSAN M. JOHNSTON, all defendants in their individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:06-cv-03137-DCN) Submitted:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6157 RICKY LAFAYETTE MURRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFREY D. YOUNGS, Official Capacity; J. BENJAMIN APLIN; SYMMES W. CULBERTSON; FLETCHER N. SMITH, JR.; DAWN V. KOFFS KEY; SUSAN M. JOHNSTON, all defendants in their individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:06-cv-03137-DCN) Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 15, 2007 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Lafayette Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Evans, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ricky Lafayette Murray appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Youngs, No. 9:06-cv-03137-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer