Filed: Jun. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6371 BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson, VPB, Official; GENE JOHNSON, Director; MARK R. WARNER, Governor; JAMES A. SISK, Manager, Official, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-00546-MHL) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WI
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6371 BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson, VPB, Official; GENE JOHNSON, Director; MARK R. WARNER, Governor; JAMES A. SISK, Manager, Official, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-00546-MHL) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WIL..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6371 BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson, VPB, Official; GENE JOHNSON, Director; MARK R. WARNER, Governor; JAMES A. SISK, Manager, Official, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-00546-MHL) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the magistrate judge’s order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Downey v. Fahey, No. 3:05-cv-00546-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -