Filed: Oct. 17, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6681 FRANK AUSTIN ARCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILBUR F. AMONETTE, Doctor; TIMOTHY PAUL THOMPSON; REBECCA ARNEY, Nurse; DEBORAH MICHELLE KESLING, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00088-GEC) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6681 FRANK AUSTIN ARCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILBUR F. AMONETTE, Doctor; TIMOTHY PAUL THOMPSON; REBECCA ARNEY, Nurse; DEBORAH MICHELLE KESLING, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00088-GEC) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges,..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6681 FRANK AUSTIN ARCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILBUR F. AMONETTE, Doctor; TIMOTHY PAUL THOMPSON; REBECCA ARNEY, Nurse; DEBORAH MICHELLE KESLING, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00088-GEC) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Austin Archer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frank Austin Archer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Archer v. Amonette, No. 7:07-cv-00088-GEC (W.D. Va. filed on Apr. 9, 2007 & entered on Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
