Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tully v. Spicer, 07-6682 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-6682 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6682 THOMAS M. TULLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia Commonwealth Attorney; MELISSA RICE, Director of Victim Witness Program; FRED D. HILDEBRAND, Supervisor of Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; GENE BOYCE, Telephone overseer at Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; LISA HOSKINS, Convicted liar in Virginia Court System, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the Uni
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6682 THOMAS M. TULLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NICOLE M. SPICER, Frederick County Virginia Commonwealth Attorney; MELISSA RICE, Director of Victim Witness Program; FRED D. HILDEBRAND, Supervisor of Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; GENE BOYCE, Telephone overseer at Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center; LISA HOSKINS, Convicted liar in Virginia Court System, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00188-SGW) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas M. Tully, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully v. Spicer, No. 7:07-cv-00188-SGW (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer