Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Estate of Wendell Hester v. United States, 07-1400 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 07-1400 Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 21, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1400 ESTATE OF WENDELL HESTER, Stephen P. Bishop, Executor, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00041-sgw-jgw) Submitted: September 29, 2008 Decided: October 21, 2008 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1400 ESTATE OF WENDELL HESTER, Stephen P. Bishop, Executor, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00041-sgw-jgw) Submitted: September 29, 2008 Decided: October 21, 2008 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aubrey J. Owen, OWEN & TRUBAN, PLC, Winchester, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Farber, Arthur T. Catterall, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: The estate of Wendell Hester appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States on a tax refund suit, 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2000). At issue is whether the assets that were improperly transferred to the decedent’s investment account were includible in his gross estate. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs, and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Estate of Wendell Hester v. United States, No. 5:06-cv-00041-sgw-jgw (W.D. Va. March 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer