Filed: Apr. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1074 YVETTE COLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GRACE B. BENNETT, Magistrate Judge, Hampton County; HAMPTON COUNTY; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomom Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:07-cv-03748-SB) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Seni
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1074 YVETTE COLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GRACE B. BENNETT, Magistrate Judge, Hampton County; HAMPTON COUNTY; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomom Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:07-cv-03748-SB) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1074 YVETTE COLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GRACE B. BENNETT, Magistrate Judge, Hampton County; HAMPTON COUNTY; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomom Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:07-cv-03748-SB) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 4, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yvette Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Yvette Cole appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cole v. Bennett, No. 9:07-cv-03748-SB (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
