Filed: Aug. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1329 JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD, Debtors - Appellants, v. ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00484-BO; BK-04-04082-8-JRL) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1329 JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD, Debtors - Appellants, v. ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00484-BO; BK-04-04082-8-JRL) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1329 JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD, Debtors - Appellants, v. ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00484-BO; BK-04-04082-8-JRL) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Woodard, Jr., Carolyn J. Woodard, Appellants Pro Se. Stephen Levi Beaman, BEAMAN & KING, PA, Wilson, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny Woodard, Jr., and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of a prior order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodard v. Browning, Nos. 5:06-cv-00484-BO; BK-04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -