Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marshall v. Compher, 08-1342 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-1342 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1342 MARIAN MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY COMPHER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv- 02394-AMD) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marian Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph O’Br
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1342 MARIAN MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY COMPHER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv- 02394-AMD) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marian Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph O’Brien, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marian Marshall appeals the district court’s order granting Gary Compher’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Compher, No. 1:07-cv-02394-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer