Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hunt v. Greenville County, 08-2348 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-2348 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2348 WANDA HUNT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE AND RICE; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Sheriff’s Department, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00857-HFF) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Ju
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2348 WANDA HUNT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE AND RICE; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Sheriff’s Department, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00857-HFF) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wanda Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Michael J. Bogle, Samuel W. Outten, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v. Greenville County, No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer