Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cooper v. Miller, 08-8466 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 08-8466 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 12, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8466 TERRY COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. K. MILLER, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity; NURSE MCDOUGAL, individually and in her official capacity; EDWARD J. TURMELL, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-01006-CMC) Submitted: April 20
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8466 TERRY COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. K. MILLER, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity; NURSE MCDOUGAL, individually and in her official capacity; EDWARD J. TURMELL, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-01006-CMC) Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Edward A. Love, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. Miller, No. 3:08-cv-01006-CMC (D.S.C. filed Oct. 31, 2008 & entered Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer