Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Williams v. Jabe, 09-6099 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-6099 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jul. 29, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6099 CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden (A.C.C.); TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Supervisor (A.C.C.); THOMAS SIMMONS, Chaplain (A.C.C.); LIEUTENANT HARDEN, Shift Commander (A.C.C.); SERGEANT TINCHER (A.C.C.), Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6099 CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden (A.C.C.); TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Supervisor (A.C.C.); THOMAS SIMMONS, Chaplain (A.C.C.); LIEUTENANT HARDEN, Shift Commander (A.C.C.); SERGEANT TINCHER (A.C.C.), Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00061-sgw-mfu) Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Jabe, No. 7:08-cv-00061-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer