Filed: Nov. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6270 TERRY J. MOORE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. J. MILLER, Corrections Officer; A. TAYLOR, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN; SERGEANT DAY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu) Submitted: October 14, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6270 TERRY J. MOORE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. J. MILLER, Corrections Officer; A. TAYLOR, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN; SERGEANT DAY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu) Submitted: October 14, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6270 TERRY J. MOORE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. J. MILLER, Corrections Officer; A. TAYLOR, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN; SERGEANT DAY, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu) Submitted: October 14, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry J. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry J. Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Miller, No. 7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2009; Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
