Filed: May 19, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6788 FORREST RAY KYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex; WARDEN DAVID BALLARD, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cv-00010-REM) Submitted: March 3, 2010 Decided: May 19, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubli
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6788 FORREST RAY KYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex; WARDEN DAVID BALLARD, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cv-00010-REM) Submitted: March 3, 2010 Decided: May 19, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6788
FORREST RAY KYLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex;
WARDEN DAVID BALLARD,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:02-cv-00010-REM)
Submitted: March 3, 2010 Decided: May 19, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Forrest Ray Kyle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg,
Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Forrest Ray Kyle appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kyle v.
McBride, No. 2:02-cv-00010-REM (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 29, 2002;
Mar. 24, 2009). We deny Kyle’s motion to appoint counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2