Filed: Sep. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1282 MICHAEL E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES; KATHRYN M. SEIFERT; KAREN E. RAY; PAUL DESPRES, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01549-BEL) Submitted: September 8, 2010 Decided: September 20, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1282 MICHAEL E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES; KATHRYN M. SEIFERT; KAREN E. RAY; PAUL DESPRES, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01549-BEL) Submitted: September 8, 2010 Decided: September 20, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GR..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1282 MICHAEL E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES; KATHRYN M. SEIFERT; KAREN E. RAY; PAUL DESPRES, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01549-BEL) Submitted: September 8, 2010 Decided: September 20, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN & COURTNEY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological Servs., No. 1:09- cv-01549-BEL (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2