MARTE v. STATE, 10-6671. (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20101230068
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2010
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Francisco Marte appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Marte v. State of Maryland , No. 1:08-cv-03309-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Francisco Marte appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Marte v. State of Maryland , No. 1:08-cv-03309-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Francisco Marte appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Marte v. State of Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-03309-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
