Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Deberry v. Davis, 10-1975 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-1975 Visitors: 26
Filed: May 05, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1975 DENNIS W. DEBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEARY DAVIS, Dean Elon School of Law; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ELON UNIVERSITY; ELON UNIVERSITY; ALAN WOODLIEF, Associate Dean of Admissions, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00582-WO-LPA) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011 Be
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1975 DENNIS W. DEBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEARY DAVIS, Dean Elon School of Law; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ELON UNIVERSITY; ELON UNIVERSITY; ALAN WOODLIEF, Associate Dean of Admissions, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00582-WO-LPA) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis W. Deberry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Elizabeth L. Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis W. Deberry appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Deberry v. Davis, No. 1:08-cv-00582-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 16, 2010; entered Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer