Filed: Mar. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6902 FRANKLIN C. SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRADY W. MCWHIRTER, Officer for the Richmond Police Department; SECOND OFFICER UNKNOWN, Officer for the Richmond Police Department, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6902 FRANKLIN C. SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRADY W. MCWHIRTER, Officer for the Richmond Police Department; SECOND OFFICER UNKNOWN, Officer for the Richmond Police Department, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chie..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6902
FRANKLIN C. SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRADY W. MCWHIRTER, Officer for the Richmond Police
Department; SECOND OFFICER UNKNOWN, Officer for the Richmond
Police Department,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. M. Janet Palmer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. McWhirter, No. 2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va.
June 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2