Filed: Apr. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7624 BENJAMIN ANTHONY JOYNER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE L. EAGLETON; ANNIE SELLERS; DENNIS R. PATTERSON, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-02524-DCN) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7624 BENJAMIN ANTHONY JOYNER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE L. EAGLETON; ANNIE SELLERS; DENNIS R. PATTERSON, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-02524-DCN) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7624
BENJAMIN ANTHONY JOYNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT; WILLIE L. EAGLETON; ANNIE SELLERS; DENNIS R.
PATTERSON,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (3:09-cv-02524-DCN)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Anthony Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh
Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Anthony Joyner appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Joyner v. Ozmint, No. 3:09-cv-02524-DCN (D.S.C.
Sept. 22, 2010; Sept. 23, 2010; Nov. 3, 2010). We deny Joyner’s
motions to appoint counsel and for transcripts at government
expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2