Filed: May 24, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6146 DUSTIN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia DOC; OFFICER BYRD; OFFICER MACKLIN; TWO UNNAMED OFFICERS; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional; UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF AT GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00434-H
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6146 DUSTIN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia DOC; OFFICER BYRD; OFFICER MACKLIN; TWO UNNAMED OFFICERS; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional; UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF AT GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00434-HC..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6146
DUSTIN WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia DOC; OFFICER BYRD;
OFFICER MACKLIN; TWO UNNAMED OFFICERS; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief
Warden, Greensville Correctional; UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF AT
GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dustin Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dustin Walker appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reinstate his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Walker v. Johnson, No. 2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM
(E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2